Salesforce
ServiceNow
Download Case Study
Download Case Study
Register to read the complete solution and benefits of this Case Study as a PDF on your email.
Table of Contents
Salesforce is a metadata-driven, highly customizable platform for businesses to tailor their sales, services, marketing, commerce, and other operations in their own way. You can configure most processes without touching code, and only use Apex or LWCs when you truly need advanced logic or UI behavior.
But as metadata and code start working with each other, it becomes necessary to structure them in a maintainable and scalable way.
Here in this blog, we will help you with the Salesforce CRM customization best practices to maintain a Salesforce org that is scalable and aligned with the platform architecture.
As said earlier, Salesforce relies on the metadata to decide what to show, what to automate, and how to enforce rules. That’s why it’s always smarter to start with configuration before writing code.
Simply saying, you should start the customization using Flows, Dynamic Forms, Lightning App Builder, and Validation Rules.
Metadata loads faster, deploys easier, and remains compatible across Salesforce releases. On the opposite side, custom coding requires testing, governance, which could introduce technical debt when used unnecessarily. Additionally, it will help you to keep your Salesforce org lightweight and scalable.
How to follow this best practice:
Hardcoded logic happens when specific org-specific values like record IDs, discount percentages, routing paths, or approval thresholds are written directly inside Apex classes, validation rules, or Flows.
Hardcoded logic might work at first, but it locks business rules into the system in a way that calls for code edits or deployments every time something changes. For example, if a discount threshold moves from 10% to 15%, a developer must update the value in code and push a deployment just to reflect a simple business modification.
Custom Metadata Types (CMDT) remove that rigidity. Instead of writing logic inside code, you store the values as configurable metadata records that the system can reference dynamically. This gives admins complete control to adjust rules as the business evolves—without touching code or altering flow structure. It reduces development effort, avoids unnecessary deployments, and prevents errors caused by outdated hardcoded values persistent in automation.
How to follow this best practice:
When customizing a Salesforce org, profiles act only as the foundation layer that defines login settings and basic user identity. Therefore, relying on profiles to manage access to custom fields, Lightning components, or app permissions creates rigidity because every change forces you to modify or clone the entire Profile. This process becomes unmanageable as your org grows.
Permission sets are designed to handle incremental access. They allow you to assign object permissions, field-level security, tab visibility, feature permissions, and access to custom components without altering a user’s Profile. So when customization increases, like new fields, new Lightning Pages, and new flows are added, permission sets allow you to grant access selectively and consistently, without creating a sprawl of similar Profiles that differ only slightly.
How to follow these Salesforce customization best practices:
In a customized Salesforce org, Flows and Apex often work in chained execution. For instance, record-triggered Flows update data, which invokes triggers leading to calling additional Flows or asynchronous Apex.
However, when any part of the chained execution fails, without exception handling, Salesforce does not return detailed error information to the UI. This results in failed transactions, rolled-back DML operations, and automation paths that terminate without context. So, every Salesforce customization must have explicit error-handling logic.
Salesforce does not automatically expose Flow faults or unhandled Apex exceptions in a meaningful way. A Flow without a fault path will simply stop processing at the failing element. Similarly, Apex without a Try-Catch block throws an unhandled exception that rolls back the entire transaction and leaves only a trace in the debug log, which is not practical for real-time monitoring.
Keep it short; without a structured capture mechanism, it becomes impractical to identify which automation layer failed, what input data triggered the exception, or whether any partial operations occurred before the rollback.
So, when you have a structured approach, the customization becomes fault-tolerant and observable.
When text such as error messages, instructions, button names, or warnings is written directly inside a Flow, Apex class, or LWC, it becomes hardcoded into that component. This means any update to the text, no matter how small, will need editing the Flow versions, modifying Apex, or redeploying the LWC. So, it will create additional maintenance work for the Salesforce developer hired.
Creating custom labels for all user-facing text is one of the best Salesforce customization practices.
Custom Labels store text as metadata, separate from the logic that uses it. Salesforce loads these labels at runtime, which allows you to change the text in one place without touching the automation or code. It also enables translation support automatically through the Translation Workbench.
How to follow this best practice:
In a customized Salesforce org, the most important information is not the technical build details; it is the functional reason the customization exists. Lengthy technical documentation is rarely used, but concise functional notes give future admins the context they need to understand how a Flow, Apex class, validation rule, or Lightning page fits into the business process.
When the purpose and usage of a customization are documented clearly, it prevents duplicated automation, logic conflicts, and accidental removal of components that still support active processes. Functional notes make it easy to trace which automation is responsible for which part of the workflow.
How to document effectively:
Include the following details for every Flow, Apex logic, validation rule, custom object, or major configuration:

A customized Salesforce org is not the one with automation; it should have traceable and easy-to-modify customization that supports the organization’s growth, not hinders it.
We have discussed some of the proven Salesforce customization best practices. You should prioritize metadata wherever possible, keep your logic configurable, manage access through permission sets, and include proper error handling and documentation. This creates a Salesforce org that supports growth without adding unnecessary technical debt.
Besides these practices, the best one is hiring Salesforce experts who have experience in Salesforce customization. These experts can learn about your needs and help you with a tailored Salesforce org following best practices.
Access a team of certified IT professionals.
Let us know the skills you want to augment your organization, and we’ll help you fill the skill gap rapidly.
By submitting the form, you consent to Smart IT Staff processing your information in accordance with the Privacy Policy. Your information is safe with us, and we will use it for the intended purposes only. You can opt out of email updates at any time.